↓ Skip to main content

Aedes albopictus and the reemergence of Dengue

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aedes albopictus and the reemergence of Dengue
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Rezza

Abstract

Dengue is a vector-borne disease that is estimated to affect millions of individuals each year in tropical and subtropical areas, and it is reemerging in areas that have been disease-free for relatively long periods of time. In this issue of the journal, Peng et al. report on a Dengue outbreak in a city in southern China that had been disease-free for more than two decades. The infection, which was due to serotype 1, was introduced by a traveler from South-east Asia and transmitted by Aedes albopictus, the Asian tiger mosquito. Compared to Aedes aegypti, which is the most important vector of Dengue, Ae albopictus is a less competent vector of arboviruses, and the epidemics it causes are milder. However, Ae albopictus is becoming an increasingly important vector because of its rapidly changing global distribution. In particular, the worldwide trade in second hand tires, which often contain water and are an ideal place for eggs and larvae, has been a key factor in the large-scale conquest of Ae albopictus, which easily adapts to new environments, even in a temperate climate. This expansion is creating new opportunities for viruses to circulate in new areas, becoming a common cause of epidemics in Ae aegypti-free countries, from Hawaii to Mauritius. The outbreak in China, like similar events, was mild and short-lived. Because epidemics due to Ae albopictus are milder, the replacement of Ae aegypti with the tiger mosquito could even result in public-health benefits. However, there is no solid evidence of this, and the milder course of the outbreak could be in part explained by the relatively short duration of the hot season in some affected areas. Since it is almost impossible to prevent Ae albopictus from being introduced in a country, mosquito-control measures at local level remain the most effective means of controlling arbovirus outbreaks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 <1%
French Polynesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 296 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 20%
Student > Master 53 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Researcher 41 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 61 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 10%
Environmental Science 15 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 64 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2013.
All research outputs
#3,380,227
of 23,802,862 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,863
of 15,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,087
of 250,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#32
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,802,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.