↓ Skip to main content

miRdSNP: a database of disease-associated SNPs and microRNA target sites on 3'UTRs of human genes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
miRdSNP: a database of disease-associated SNPs and microRNA target sites on 3'UTRs of human genes
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew E Bruno, Li Li, James L Kalabus, Yuzhuo Pan, Aiming Yu, Zihua Hu

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can lead to the susceptibility and onset of diseases through their effects on gene expression at the posttranscriptional level. Recent findings indicate that SNPs could create, destroy, or modify the efficiency of miRNA binding to the 3'UTR of a gene, resulting in gene dysregulation. With the rapidly growing number of published disease-associated SNPs (dSNPs), there is a strong need for resources specifically recording dSNPs on the 3'UTRs and their nucleotide distance from miRNA target sites. We present here miRdSNP, a database incorporating three important areas of dSNPs, miRNA target sites, and diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 107 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Computer Science 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2012.
All research outputs
#3,020,461
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,113
of 10,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,921
of 246,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#31
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.