↓ Skip to main content

Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review
Published in
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1897-4287-9-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon C Tilburt, Katherine M James, Pamela S Sinicrope, David T Eton, Brian A Costello, Jantey Carey, Melanie A Lane, Shawna L Ehlers, Patricia J Erwin, Katherine E Nowakowski, Mohammad H Murad

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 24 24%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#76
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,043
of 123,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them