↓ Skip to main content

Implications of troponin testing in clinical medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implications of troponin testing in clinical medicine
Published in
Trials, April 2001
DOI 10.1186/cvm-2-2-075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Britta U Goldmann, Robert H Christenson, Christian W Hamm, Thomas Meinertz, E Magnus Ohman

Abstract

During the past decade considerable research has been conducted into the use of cardiac troponins, their diagnostic capability and their potential to allow risk stratification in patients with acute chest pain. Determination of risk in patients with suspected myocardial ischaemia is known to be as important as retrospective confirmation of a diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Therefore, creatine kinase (CK)-MB - the former 'gold standard' in detecting myocardial necrosis - has been supplanted by new, more accurate biomarkers.Measurement of cardiac troponin levels constitute a substantial determinant in assessment of ischaemic heart disease, the presentations of which range from silent ischaemia to acute MI. Under these conditions, troponin release is regarded as surrogate marker of thrombus formation and peripheral embolization, and therefore new therapeutic strategies are focusing on potent antithrombotic regimens to improve long-term outcomes. Although elevated troponin levels are highly sensitive and specific indicators of myocardial damage, they are not always reflective of acute ischaemic coronary artery disease; other processes have been identified that cause elevations in these biomarkers. However, because prognosis appears to be related to the presence of troponins regardless of the mechanism of myocardial damage, clinicians increasingly rely on troponin assays when formulating individual therapeutic plans.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Australia 2 6%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 26 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 23%
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 2 6%