You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do positive or negative experiences of social support relate to current and future health? Results from the Doetinchem Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-65 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simone Croezen, H Susan J Picavet, Annemien Haveman-Nies, WM Monique Verschuren, Lisette CPGM de Groot, Pieter van't Veer |
| Abstract |
Cross-sectional studies have reported associations between social support and health, but prospective evidence is less conclusive. This study aims to investigate the associations of positive and negative experiences of social support with current and future lifestyle factors, biological risk factors, self-perceived health and mental health over a 10-year period. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,801
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,247
of 14,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,102
of 246,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#151
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.