Title |
Reinvestigation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome annotation by comparison to the genome of a related fungus: Ashbya gossypii
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, June 2003
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2003-4-7-r45 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sophie Brachat, Fred S Dietrich, Sylvia Voegeli, Zhihong Zhang, Larissa Stuart, Anita Lerch, Krista Gates, Tom Gaffney, Peter Philippsen |
Abstract |
The recently sequenced genome of the filamentous fungus Ashbya gossypii revealed remarkable similarities to that of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae both at the level of homology and synteny (conservation of gene order). Thus, it became possible to reinvestigate the S. cerevisiae genome in the syntenic regions leading to an improved annotation. We have identified 23 novel S. cerevisiae open reading frames (ORFs) as syntenic homologs of A. gossypii genes; for all but one, homologs are present in other eukaryotes including humans. Other comparisons identified 13 overlooked introns and suggested 69 potential sequence corrections resulting in ORF extensions or ORF fusions with improved homology to the syntenic A. gossypii homologs. Of the proposed corrections, 25 were tested and confirmed by resequencing. In addition, homologs of nearly 1,000 S. cerevisiae ORFs, presently annotated as hypothetical, were found in A. gossypii at syntenic positions and can therefore be considered as authentic genes. Finally, we suggest that over 400 S. cerevisiae ORFs that overlap other ORFs in S. cerevisiae and for which no homolog can be detected in A. gossypii should be regarded as spurious. Although, the S. cerevisiae genome is rightly considered as one of the most accurately sequenced and annotated eukaryotic genomes, we have shown that it still benefits substantially from comparison to the completed sequence and syntenic gene map of A. gossypii, an evolutionarily related fungus. This type of approach will strongly support the annotation of more complex genomes such as the human and murine genomes. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
United States | 2 | 3% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 47 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 34% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 60% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 19% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |