↓ Skip to main content

A case study of the reproducibility of transcriptional reporter cell-based RNAi screens in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A case study of the reproducibility of transcriptional reporter cell-based RNAi screens in Drosophila
Published in
Genome Biology, September 2007
DOI 10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramanuj DasGupta, Kent Nybakken, Matthew Booker, Bernard Mathey-Prevot, Foster Gonsalves, Binita Changkakoty, Norbert Perrimon

Abstract

Off-target effects have been demonstrated to be a major source of false-positives in RNA interference (RNAi) high-throughput screens. In this study, we re-assess the previously published transcriptional reporter-based whole-genome RNAi screens for the Wingless and Hedgehog signaling pathways using second generation double-stranded RNA libraries. Furthermore, we investigate other factors that may influence the outcome of such screens, including cell-type specificity, robustness of reporters, and assay normalization, which determine the efficacy of RNAi-knockdown of target genes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
China 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 42 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Professor 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 3 7%