↓ Skip to main content

Current strategies for treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration: substitution and regeneration possibilities

Overview of attention for article published in Biomaterials Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current strategies for treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration: substitution and regeneration possibilities
Published in
Biomaterials Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40824-017-0106-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastião van Uden, Joana Silva-Correia, Joaquim Miguel Oliveira, Rui Luís Reis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 66 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 32 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Materials Science 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 77 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,518,560
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials Research
#84
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,120
of 338,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.