↓ Skip to main content

A qualitative study of clinic and community member perspectives on intervention toolkits: “Unless the toolkit is used it won’t help solve the problem”

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A qualitative study of clinic and community member perspectives on intervention toolkits: “Unless the toolkit is used it won’t help solve the problem”
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12913-017-2413-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melinda M. Davis, Sonya Howk, Margaret Spurlock, Paul B McGinnis, Deborah J. Cohen, Lyle J. Fagnan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 26 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 12%
Psychology 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,954,310
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,902
of 7,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,812
of 315,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#113
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.