↓ Skip to main content

GO functional similarity clustering depends on similarity measure, clustering method, and annotation completeness

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GO functional similarity clustering depends on similarity measure, clustering method, and annotation completeness
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12859-019-2752-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meng Liu, Paul D. Thomas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Computer Science 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,339,647
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,895
of 7,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,968
of 351,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#59
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.