↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Quasi-experimental trial of diabetes Self-Management Automated and Real-Time Telephonic Support (SMARTSteps) in a Medicaid managed care plan: study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike

What is this page?

Summary Policy documents Twitter Wikipedia Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quasi-experimental trial of diabetes Self-Management Automated and Real-Time Telephonic Support (SMARTSteps) in a Medicaid managed care plan: study protocol
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-22
Pubmed ID
22280514
Authors

Neda Ratanawongsa, Margaret A Handley, Judy Quan, Urmimala Sarkar, Kelly Pfeifer, Catalina Soria, Dean Schillinger

Abstract

Health information technology can enhance self-management and quality of life for patients with chronic disease and overcome healthcare barriers for patients with limited English proficiency. After a randomized controlled trial of a multilingual automated telephone self-management support program (ATSM) improved patient-centered dimensions of diabetes care in safety net clinics, we collaborated with a nonprofit Medicaid managed care plan to translate research into practice, offering ATSM as a covered benefit and augmenting ATSM to promote medication activation. This paper describes the protocol of the Self-Management Automated and Real-Time Telephonic Support Project (SMARTSteps).

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 210 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 17%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 51 23%
Unknown 42 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 32%
Social Sciences 23 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Psychology 14 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 51 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,208,328
of 13,935,361 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,012
of 4,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,597
of 210,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,935,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them

This page is provided by Altmetric.