↓ Skip to main content

The Role of XPG in Processing (CAG)n/(CTG)n DNA Hairpins

Overview of attention for article published in Cell & Bioscience, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of XPG in Processing (CAG)n/(CTG)n DNA Hairpins
Published in
Cell & Bioscience, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/2045-3701-1-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caixia Hou, Tianyi Zhang, Lei Tian, Jian Huang, Liya Gu, Guo-Min Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 38%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 38%
Neuroscience 3 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Chemistry 2 13%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,368,368
of 24,690,130 outputs
Outputs from Cell & Bioscience
#160
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,408
of 112,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell & Bioscience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,690,130 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them