You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Socioeconomic and ethnic differences in the relation between dietary costs and dietary quality: the HELIUS study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-019-0445-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joreintje D. Mackenbach, S. Coosje Dijkstra, Joline W. J. Beulens, Jacob C. Seidell, Marieke B. Snijder, Karien Stronks, Pablo Monsivais, Mary Nicolaou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 6 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 56 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,017,961
of 24,292,134 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#704
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,089
of 355,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,292,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.