You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Roberts, Anthony Dowell, Jing-Bao Nie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 24% |
| United States | 5 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 55% |
| Scientists | 14 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 183 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 181 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 106 | 9% |
| Researcher | 85 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 6% |
| Other | 157 | 13% |
| Unknown | 399 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 141 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 104 | 9% |
| Psychology | 101 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 91 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 5% |
| Other | 246 | 21% |
| Unknown | 441 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,265,325
of 24,969,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#140
of 2,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,074
of 357,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,969,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.