You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prognostic models for breast cancer: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12885-019-5442-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Minh Tung Phung, Sandar Tin Tin, J. Mark Elwood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 98 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 100 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,175,336
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,765
of 8,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,833
of 353,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#61
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,530 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.