↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of health related quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome patients

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of health related quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome patients
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-10-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raika Jamali, Arsia Jamali, Maryam Poorrahnama, Abdollah Omidi, Bardia Jamali, Neda Moslemi, Reza Ansari, Shahab Dolatshahi, Naser Ebrahimi Daryani

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is an important measure in the management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). Controversy exists in the findings of studies evaluating QOL in IBS subtypes, and little is known about this issue in Iranian patients. Determination of the factors affecting QOL in IBS patients may influence treatment outcomes. The aims of this study are to: 1) compare QOL between subtypes in a sample of Iranian IBS patients, 2) determine the factors associated with QOL in IBS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Psychology 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,586,143
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#964
of 2,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,891
of 254,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.