You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A simple and efficient method for the long-term preservation of plant cell suspension cultures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-8-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne-Marie Boisson, Elisabeth Gout, Richard Bligny, Corinne Rivasseau |
| Abstract |
The repeated weekly subculture of plant cell suspension is labour intensive and increases the risk of variation from parental cells lines. Most of the procedures to preserve cultures are based on controlled freezing/thawing and storage in liquid nitrogen. However, cells viability after unfreezing is uncertain. The long-term storage and regeneration of plant cell cultures remains a priority. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2012.
All research outputs
#17,655,049
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#892
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,864
of 246,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.