You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inverse probability of treatment-weighted competing risks analysis: an application on long-term risk of urinary adverse events after prostate cancer treatments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-017-0367-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte A. Bolch, Haitao Chu, Stephanie Jarosek, Stephen R. Cole, Sean Elliott, Beth Virnig |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 31% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,252,303
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#701
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,436
of 312,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.