You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whole Genome Profiling provides a robust framework for physical mapping and sequencing in the highly complex and repetitive wheat genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-13-47 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Romain Philippe, Frédéric Choulet, Etienne Paux, Jan van Oeveren, Jifeng Tang, Alexander HJ Wittenberg, Antoine Janssen, Michiel JT van Eijk, Keith Stormo, Adriana Alberti, Patrick Wincker, Eduard Akhunov, Edwin van der Vossen, Catherine Feuillet |
| Abstract |
Sequencing projects using a clone-by-clone approach require the availability of a robust physical map. The SNaPshot technology, based on pair-wise comparisons of restriction fragments sizes, has been used recently to build the first physical map of a wheat chromosome and to complete the maize physical map. However, restriction fragments sizes shared randomly between two non-overlapping BACs often lead to chimerical contigs and mis-assembled BACs in such large and repetitive genomes. Whole Genome Profiling (WGP™) was developed recently as a new sequence-based physical mapping technology and has the potential to limit this problem. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Belgium | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 58 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 75% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 3 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,693,655
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,310
of 10,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,966
of 248,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#54
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,708 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.