↓ Skip to main content

Gastroesophageal reflux leads to esophageal cancer in a surgical model with mice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gastroesophageal reflux leads to esophageal cancer in a surgical model with mice
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-9-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Hao, Ba Liu, Chung S Yang, Xiaoxin Chen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 38%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Psychology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,588,614
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#489
of 1,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,710
of 111,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.