You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Do the key functions of an intervention designed from the same specifications vary according to context? Investigating the transferability of a public health intervention in France
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0880-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mélanie Villeval, Emilie Gaborit, Florent Berault, Thierry Lang, Michelle Kelly-Irving |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 19% |
United States | 4 | 11% |
Australia | 3 | 8% |
Canada | 3 | 8% |
Ireland | 2 | 6% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Senegal | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 18 | 50% |
Members of the public | 14 | 39% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 21% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
Librarian | 2 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 28% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,680,872
of 24,974,461 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#317
of 1,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,711
of 358,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,974,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.