You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
India's JSY cash transfer program for maternal health: Who participates and who doesn't - a report from Ujjain district
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-9-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristi Sidney, Vishal Diwan, Ziad El-Khatib, Ayesha de Costa |
| Abstract |
India launched a national conditional cash transfer program, Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY), aimed at reducing maternal mortality by promoting institutional delivery in 2005. It provides a cash incentive to women who give birth in public health facilities. This paper studies the extent of program uptake, reasons for participation/non participation, factors associated with non uptake of the program, and the role played by a program volunteer, accredited social health activist (ASHA), among mothers in Ujjain district in Madhya Pradesh, India. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 22% |
| Researcher | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 43 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,682,075
of 25,216,325 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#790
of 1,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,977
of 257,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,216,325 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.