You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing the joint effect of population stratification and sample selection in studies of gene-gene (environment) interactions
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomic Data, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2156-13-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
KF Cheng, JY Lee |
Abstract |
It is well known that the presence of population stratification (PS) may cause the usual test in case-control studies to produce spurious gene-disease associations. However, the impact of the PS and sample selection (SS) is less known. In this paper, we provide a systematic study of the joint effect of PS and SS under a more general risk model containing genetic and environmental factors. We provide simulation results to show the magnitude of the bias and its impact on type I error rate of the usual chi-square test under a wide range of PS level and selection bias. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Germany | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Professor | 2 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 18% |
Mathematics | 2 | 12% |
Computer Science | 2 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2012.
All research outputs
#3,710,178
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#116
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,993
of 252,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.