↓ Skip to main content

The pituri story: a review of the historical literature surrounding traditional Australian Aboriginal use of nicotine in Central Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 767)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The pituri story: a review of the historical literature surrounding traditional Australian Aboriginal use of nicotine in Central Australia
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-6-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Ratsch, Kathryn J Steadman, Fiona Bogossian

Abstract

The harmful outcomes of nicotine self administration have been the focus of sustained global health education campaigns that have targeted tobacco smoking and to a lesser extent, smokeless tobacco use. 'Smokeless tobacco' infers that the nicotine is not burnt, and administration can be through a range of methods including chewing.The chewing of wild tobacco plants (Nicotiana spp.) is practiced across a broad inland area of Central Australia by traditional Aboriginal groups. Collectively these plants are known by a variety of names - one common name being 'pituri'. This is the first paper to examine the historical literature and consider the linkage between pituri use and health outcomes. Using a narrative approach, this paper reviews the literature generated since 1770 surrounding the term pituri and the behaviours associated with its use. The review examines the scientific literature, as well as the diaries and journals of nineteenth century explorers, expedition notes, and early Australian novels to expound the scientific evidence and broaden the sense of understanding related to pituri, particularly the behavioural elements. The evaluation considers the complexities of ethnobotany pertaining to language and distance and the ethnopharmacology of indigenous plant usage. The review compares the use of burnt and smokeless tobacco to pituri and establishes the foundation for research into the clinical significance and health outcomes of pituri use. Additionally, this review provides contemporary information for clinicians providing care for patients who chew pituri.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 3%
Italy 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 14%
Social Sciences 8 13%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,304,532
of 24,914,266 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#24
of 767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,051
of 100,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,914,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them