You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bench-to-bedside review: Potential strategies to protect or reverse mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis-induced organ failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, September 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc5014 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alessandro Protti, Mervyn Singer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 10% |
Professor | 11 | 9% |
Other | 35 | 28% |
Unknown | 11 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 67% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,282
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,035
of 89,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.