↓ Skip to main content

Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13017-019-0235-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moniek H. P. Verstegen, Stefan A. W. Bouwense, Frans van Workum, Richard ten Broek, Peter D. Siersema, Maroeska Rovers, Camiel Rosman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 31 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 53%
Unspecified 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 37 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,955,268
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#264
of 557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,287
of 351,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.