The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prediction of T stage in gastric carcinoma by enhanced CT and oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12957-015-0577-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tao Yu, Xinling Wang, Zilong Zhao, Fan Liu, Xiaoting Liu, Yan Zhao, Yahong Luo |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 50% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,252,656
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#111
of 2,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,576
of 267,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#9
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,065 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.