↓ Skip to main content

Determinants of selenium status in healthy adults

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Determinants of selenium status in healthy adults
Published in
Nutrition Journal, July 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald F Combs, Jennifer C Watts, Matthew I Jackson, LuAnn K Johnson, Huawei Zeng, Angela J Scheett, Eric O Uthus, Lutz Schomburg, Antonia Hoeg, Carolin S Hoefig, Cindy D Davis, John A Milner

Abstract

Selenium (Se) status in non-deficient subjects is typically assessed by the Se contents of plasma/serum. That pool comprises two functional, specific selenoprotein components and at least one non-functional, non-specific components which respond differently to changes in Se intake. A more informative means of characterizing Se status in non-deficient individuals is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Professor 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 31 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,124,536
of 24,709,170 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#640
of 1,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,282
of 123,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,709,170 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.