You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accuracy assessment of plant height using an unmanned aerial vehicle for quantitative genomic analysis in bread wheat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0419-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muhammad Adeel Hassan, Mengjiao Yang, Luping Fu, Awais Rasheed, Bangyou Zheng, Xianchun Xia, Yonggui Xiao, Zhonghu He |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 5% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 52 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 36% |
| Engineering | 10 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 56 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,080,645
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#520
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,387
of 357,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#18
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.