You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How are evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers enacted in practice? A qualitative interview study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0441-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Williamson, Hannah Tait, Fadi El Jardali, Luke Wolfenden, Sarah Thackway, Jessica Stewart, Lyndal O’Leary, Julie Dixon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 11 | 23% |
| United States | 7 | 15% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Moldova, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 62% |
| Scientists | 13 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,123,168
of 23,796,227 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#108
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,873
of 352,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,796,227 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.