↓ Skip to main content

Unrecognized myocardial infarction by echocardiography in relation to infarct characteristics as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unrecognized myocardial infarction by echocardiography in relation to infarct characteristics as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-14-s1-o36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Jaarsma, Simon Schalla, Emile C Cheriex, Martijn Smulders, Ivo M van Dongen, Patricia J Nelemans, Joachim E Wildberger, Harry J Crijns, Sebastiaan C Bekkers

Abstract

Exercise electrocardiography (ECG) is frequently used in the work-up of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), however the accuracy is reduced in women. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) stress testing can accurately diagnose CAD in women. To date, a direct comparison of CMR to ECG has not been performed. We prospectively enrolled 88 consecutive women with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of CAD. Patients underwent a comprehensive clinical evaluation, exercise ECG, a CMR stress test including perfusion and infarct imaging, and x-ray coronary angiography (CA) within 24 hours. CAD was defined as stenosis ≥70% on quantitative analysis of CA.Exercise ECG, CMR and CA was completed in 68 females (age 66.4 ± 8.8 years, number of CAD risk factors 3.5±1.4). The prevalence of CAD on CA was 29%. The Duke treadmill score (DTS) in the entire group was -3.0±5.4 and was similar in those with and without CAD (-4.5±5.8 and -2.4±5.1; P=0.12). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for CAD diagnosis was higher for CMR compared with exercise ECG (sensitivities 85% and 50%, P=0.02, specificities 94% and 73%, P=0.01, and accuracies 91% and 66%, P=0.0007, respectively). Even after applying the DTS the accuracy of CMR was higher compared to exercise ECG (area under ROC curve 0.94±0.03 vs 0.56±0.07; P=0.0001). In women with intermediate-to-high risk for CAD who are able to exercise and have interpretable resting ECG, CMR stress perfusion imaging has higher accuracy for the detection of relevant obstruction of the epicardial coronaries when directly compared to exercise ECG.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 29%
Unknown 5 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%