↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of axillary exclusion on seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of axillary exclusion on seroma formation after modified radical mastectomy
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12957-016-0801-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed Faisal, Sameh T Abu-Elela, Waleed Mostafa, Osama Antar

Abstract

Breast cancer represented 35.1 % of total female cancer cases in Egypt. Seroma is one of the most serious and common complications of mastectomy and axillary dissection with incidence between 15 and 81 %. Seroma formation delays wound healing and increases susceptibility to infection, skin flap necrosis, and persistent pain as well as prolonging convalescence. Therefore, several techniques have been investigated to minimize seroma formation with no consistent success. Axillary exclusion is a technique aimed to obliterate dead space after axillary clearance and minimize collection. Sixty-four patients were prepared for modified radical mastectomy. Of those, the study group contains 32 patients and the control group contains 32 patients. Study group had axillary exclusion while the other had the conventional procedure; total drain outputs were recorded daily for all patients prior to drain removal. The drains were removed when the daily drainage was less than 30 ml. This study contains 64 patients, the study group contains 32 patients, and the control group contains 32 patients. Age, BMI (mean control = 31.7 and study = 30.2), and tumor size were of no significant differences to be more concise on the effect of axillary exclusion. The mean of day of drain removal in the control group was 17.8 day (15-19) with a mean of total drain output of 4525.6 ml (4430-3660 ml) while the mean in the study group of day of drain removal was 11.3 (10-13) with a mean of total drain output of 1476.2 ml (620-2200 ml), p < 0.00. Axillary exclusion technique is a valuable procedure that significantly decreases seroma postmastectomy and axillary dissection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Lecturer 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unknown 17 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1,099
of 2,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,808
of 312,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#23
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.