You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long-lasting insecticidal nets and indoor residual spraying may not be sufficient to eliminate malaria in a low malaria incidence area: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial in Ethiopia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-2775-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eskindir Loha, Wakgari Deressa, Taye Gari, Meshesha Balkew, Oljira Kenea, Tarekegn Solomon, Alemayehu Hailu, Bjarne Robberstad, Meselech Assegid, Hans J. Overgaard, Bernt Lindtjørn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Norway | 2 | 22% |
Ethiopia | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
Researcher | 24 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
Lecturer | 10 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 15% |
Unknown | 54 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
Other | 28 | 18% |
Unknown | 58 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,309,264
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#434
of 5,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,454
of 364,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#8
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.