You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Psychometric testing of a checklist for procedural training of peripheral intravenous insertion
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advances in Simulation, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41077-019-0092-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lisa A. Buckley, Gregory E. Gilbert, Eric B. Bauman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,394,277
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#183
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,301
of 350,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.