You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a heart rate variability and complexity model in predicting the need for life-saving interventions amongst trauma patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Burns & Trauma, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41038-019-0147-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aravin Kumar, Nan Liu, Zhi Xiong Koh, Jayne Jie Yi Chiang, Yuda Soh, Ting Hway Wong, Andrew Fu Wah Ho, Takashi Tagami, Stephanie Fook-Chong, Marcus Eng Hock Ong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| China | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,963,683
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Burns & Trauma
#83
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,652
of 363,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns & Trauma
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.