You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of aerobic exercise on pain and disability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1019-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irlei dos Santos, Adriana Claudia Lunardi, Naiane Teixeira Bastos de Oliveira, Matheus Oliveira de Almeida, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 52 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,167,232
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#593
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,684
of 349,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#13
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.