↓ Skip to main content

Relative efficacy of interventions in the treatment of second-line non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relative efficacy of interventions in the treatment of second-line non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12885-019-5569-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian D. Vickers, Katherine B. Winfree, Gebra Cuyun Carter, Urpo Kiiskinen, Min-Hua Jen, Donald Stull, James A. Kaye, David P. Carbone

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Other 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 33 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 31 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,577,942
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,454
of 9,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,892
of 367,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#50
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.