↓ Skip to main content

TAK-1/p38/nNFκB signaling inhibits myoblast differentiation by increasing levels of Activin A

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Muscle, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 388)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TAK-1/p38/nNFκB signaling inhibits myoblast differentiation by increasing levels of Activin A
Published in
Skeletal Muscle, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/2044-5040-2-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Ulrike Trendelenburg, Angelika Meyer, Carsten Jacobi, Jerome N Feige, David J Glass

Abstract

Skeletal-muscle differentiation is required for the regeneration of myofibers after injury. The differentiation capacity of satellite cells is impaired in settings of old age, which is at least one factor in the onset of sarcopenia, the age-related loss of skeletal-muscle mass and major cause of frailty. One important cause of impaired regeneration is increased levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β accompanied by reduced Notch signaling. Pro-inflammatory cytokines are also upregulated in aging, which led us hypothesize that they might potentially contribute to impaired regeneration in sarcopenia. Thus, in this study, we further analyzed the muscle differentiation-inhibition pathway mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines in human skeletal muscle cells (HuSKMCs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 29 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 32 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2012.
All research outputs
#2,562,418
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Muscle
#50
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,220
of 253,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Muscle
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them