↓ Skip to main content

Site-specific endometrial injury improves implantation and pregnancy in patients with repeated implantation failures

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Site-specific endometrial injury improves implantation and pregnancy in patients with repeated implantation failures
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1477-7827-9-140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shang Yu Huang, Chin-Jung Wang, Yung-Kuei Soong, Hsin-Shih Wang, Mei Li Wang, Chieh Yu Lin, Chia Lin Chang

Abstract

To test whether a site-specific hysteroscopic biopsy-induced injury in the endometrium during the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycle improves subsequent embryo implantation in patients with repeated implantation failure, a total of 30 patients who have had good responses to controlled ovulation stimulation but have failed to achieve pregnancy after two or more transfers of good-quality embryos were recruited in this prospective study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,063,443
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#215
of 965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,122
of 139,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.