↓ Skip to main content

Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12962-018-0126-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger I. Glass

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 26%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 15%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,043,397
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#298
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,422
of 350,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#24
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.