You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safety and clinical impact of FEES – results of the FEES-registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurological Research and Practice, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42466-019-0021-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rainer Dziewas, Matthias auf dem Brinke, Ulrich Birkmann, Götz Bräuer, Kolja Busch, Franziska Cerra, Renate Damm-Lunau, Juliane Dunkel, Amelie Fellgiebel, Elisabeth Garms, Jörg Glahn, Sandra Hagen, Sophie Held, Christine Helfer, Mirko Hiller, Christina Horn-Schenk, Christoph Kley, Nikolaus Lange, Sriramya Lapa, Christian Ledl, Beate Lindner-Pfleghar, Marion Mertl-Rötzer, Madeleine Müller, Hermann Neugebauer, Duygu Özsucu, Michael Ohms, Markus Perniß, Waltraud Pfeilschifter, Tanja Plass, Christian Roth, Robin Roukens, Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke, Beate Schumann, Julia Schwarze, Kathi Schweikert, Holger Stege, Dirk Theuerkauf, Randall S. Thomas, Ulrich Vahle, Nancy Voigt, Hermann Weber, Cornelius J. Werner, Rainer Wirth, Ingo Wittich, Hartwig Woldag, Tobias Warnecke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 22 | 38% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Ireland | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 76% |
| Scientists | 7 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 34 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2020.
All research outputs
#642,681
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#6
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,287
of 367,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them