You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using theories of behaviour change to transition multidisciplinary trauma team training from the training environment to clinical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0890-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margaret Murphy, Andrea McCloughen, Kate Curtis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 44 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,725,603
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#917
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,051
of 350,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#24
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.