↓ Skip to main content

Nonlinear estimation of BOLD signals with the aid of cerebral blood volume imaging

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonlinear estimation of BOLD signals with the aid of cerebral blood volume imaging
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12938-016-0137-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Zhang, Zuli Wang, Zhongzhou Cai, Qiang Lin, Zhenghui Hu

Abstract

The hemodynamic balloon model describes the change in coupling from underlying neural activity to observed blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response. It plays an increasing important role in brain research using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. However, changes in the BOLD signal are sensitive to the resting blood volume fraction (i.e., [Formula: see text]) associated with the regional vasculature. In previous studies the value was arbitrarily set to a physiologically plausible value to circumvent the ill-posedness of the inverse problem. These approaches fail to explore actual [Formula: see text] value and could yield inaccurate model estimation. The present study represents the first empiric attempt to derive the actual [Formula: see text] from data obtained using cerebral blood volume imaging, with the aim of augmenting the existing estimation schemes. Bimanual finger tapping experiments were performed to determine how [Formula: see text] influences the model estimation of BOLD signals within a single-region and multiple-regions (i.e., dynamic causal modeling). In order to show the significance of applying the true [Formula: see text], we have presented the different results obtained when using the real [Formula: see text] and assumed [Formula: see text] in terms of single-region model estimation and dynamic causal modeling. The results show that [Formula: see text] significantly influences the estimation results within a single-region and multiple-regions. Using the actual [Formula: see text] might yield more realistic and physiologically meaningful model estimation results. Incorporating regional venous information in the analysis of the hemodynamic model can provide more reliable and accurate parameter estimations and model predictions, and improve the inference about brain connectivity based on fMRI data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Other 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 18%
Neuroscience 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,983,785
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#402
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,955
of 312,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.