You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of the mismatch-specific endonuclease method and denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography for the identification of HBB gene mutations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Biotechnology, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6750-8-62 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chia-Cheng Hung, Yi-Ning Su, Chia-Yun Lin, Yin-Fei Chang, Chien-Hui Chang, Wen-Fang Cheng, Chi-An Chen, Chien-Nan Lee, Win-Li Lin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#427
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,052
of 85,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.