↓ Skip to main content

Which patients benefit from physical activity on prescription (PAP)? A prospective observational analysis of factors that predict increased physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which patients benefit from physical activity on prescription (PAP)? A prospective observational analysis of factors that predict increased physical activity
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-6830-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Lundqvist, Mats Börjesson, Maria E. H. Larsson, Åsa Cider, Lars Hagberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Lecturer 3 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 26 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 25 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,226,711
of 18,815,138 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,574
of 12,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,782
of 279,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,815,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.