You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enteral nutrition with eicosapentaenoic acid, γ-linolenic acid and antioxidants in the early treatment of sepsis: results from a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study: the INTERSEPT Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc10267 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandro Pontes-Arruda, Laércia Ferreira Martins, Samya Maria de Lima, Alexandre Marini Isola, Diogo Toledo, Ederlon Rezende, Marcelo Maia, Gisele Brocco Magnan, the Investigating Nutritional Therapy with EPA, GLA and Antioxidants Role in Sepsis Treatment (INTERSEPT) Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 59 | 30% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,042
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,557
of 124,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#21
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.