You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heterogeneity of treatment effect by baseline risk of mortality in critically ill patients: re-analysis of three recent sepsis and ARDS randomised controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2446-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shalini Santhakumaran, Anthony Gordon, A. Toby Prevost, Cecilia O’Kane, Daniel F. McAuley, Manu Shankar-Hari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 26% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 51% |
| Scientists | 9 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,795,349
of 25,670,640 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,578
of 6,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,868
of 363,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#50
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,670,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.