↓ Skip to main content

The added value of ordinal analysis in clinical trials: an example in traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The added value of ordinal analysis in clinical trials: an example in traumatic brain injury
Published in
Critical Care, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10240
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bob Roozenbeek, Hester F Lingsma, Pablo Perel, Phil Edwards, Ian Roberts, Gordon D Murray, Andrew IR Maas, Ewout W Steyerberg, the IMPACT (International Mission on Prognosis and Clinical Trial Design in Traumatic Brain Injury) Study Group and the CRASH (Corticosteroid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury) Trial Collaborators

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 142 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 18%
Other 19 13%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 39 27%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Mathematics 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,509
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,494
of 123,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#18
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.