You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
'Pedometers cost buttons': the feasibility of implementing a pedometer based walking programme within the community
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-200 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Shaw, Elisabeth Fenwick, Graham Baker, Chloe McAdam, Claire Fitzsimons, Nanette Mutrie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,898
of 14,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,068
of 109,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#63
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.