You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fully automated quantification of biventricular volumes and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: applicability to clinical routine settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-019-0532-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sören J. Backhaus, Wieland Staab, Michael Steinmetz, Christian O. Ritter, Joachim Lotz, Gerd Hasenfuß, Andreas Schuster, Johannes T. Kowallick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 9% |
| Russia | 1 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 33% |
| Engineering | 8 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,347,457
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#418
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,845
of 364,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.